Flint, Michigan Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Flint fell 0.0 percentage points in April 2022 to 6.0%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.7 percentage points higher than the Michigan rate. The unemployment rate in Flint peaked in April 2020 at 30.1% and is now 24.1 percentage points lower. From a post peak low of 6.0% in March 2022, the unemployment rate has now grown by 0.0 percentage points. You can also compare Flint unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
Unemployment Rate | April 2022 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
National | 3.6% | 0.0 | -2.4 |
Michigan | 4.3% | -0.1 | -1.9 |
Flint | 6.0% | 0.0 | -2.0 |
Unemployment Rate: Flint, Michigan, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Flint, Michigan Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Flint peaked in April 2020 at 52,171. There are now 41,729 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Flint employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Flint, Michigan) is also available.
Unemployed Persons | April 2022 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
Flint | 10,442 | -114 | -3,526 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Flint, Michigan Unemployment History
Date | National Unemployment Rate |
Michigan Unemployment Rate |
Flint Unemployment Rate |
Flint Unemployed |
---|---|---|---|---|
May 2022 |
3.6% | — | — | — |
April 2022 |
3.6% | 4.3% | 6.0% | 10,442 |
March 2022 |
3.6% | 4.4% | 6.0% | 10,556 |
February 2022 |
3.8% | 4.7% | 6.4% | 11,070 |
January 2022 |
4.0% | 4.9% | 6.5% | 11,264 |
December 2021 |
3.9% | 5.1% | 6.7% | 11,604 |
November 2021 |
4.2% | 5.2% | 6.7% | 11,568 |
October 2021 |
4.6% | 5.4% | 6.7% | 11,664 |
September 2021 |
4.7% | 5.7% | 7.0% | 12,123 |
August 2021 |
5.2% | 6.0% | 7.3% | 12,731 |
July 2021 |
5.4% | 6.2% | 7.6% | 13,329 |
June 2021 |
5.9% | 6.3% | 7.9% | 13,747 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩