Jackson, Michigan Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Jackson fell 0.0 percentage points in April 2022 to 4.6%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.3 percentage points higher than the Michigan rate. The unemployment rate in Jackson peaked in April 2020 at 23.1% and is now 18.5 percentage points lower. From a post peak low of 4.6% in March 2022, the unemployment rate has now grown by 0.0 percentage points. You can also compare Jackson unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
Unemployment Rate | April 2022 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
National | 3.6% | 0.0 | -2.4 |
Michigan | 4.3% | -0.1 | -1.9 |
Jackson | 4.6% | 0.0 | -1.7 |
Unemployment Rate: Jackson, Michigan, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Jackson, Michigan Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Jackson peaked in April 2020 at 16,866. There are now 13,552 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Jackson employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Jackson, Michigan) is also available.
Unemployed Persons | April 2022 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
Jackson | 3,314 | -31 | -1,195 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Jackson, Michigan Unemployment History
Date | National Unemployment Rate |
Michigan Unemployment Rate |
Jackson Unemployment Rate |
Jackson Unemployed |
---|---|---|---|---|
May 2022 |
3.6% | — | — | — |
April 2022 |
3.6% | 4.3% | 4.6% | 3,314 |
March 2022 |
3.6% | 4.4% | 4.6% | 3,345 |
February 2022 |
3.8% | 4.7% | 4.8% | 3,469 |
January 2022 |
4.0% | 4.9% | 4.9% | 3,512 |
December 2021 |
3.9% | 5.1% | 5.0% | 3,609 |
November 2021 |
4.2% | 5.2% | 5.0% | 3,596 |
October 2021 |
4.6% | 5.4% | 5.0% | 3,620 |
September 2021 |
4.7% | 5.7% | 5.2% | 3,753 |
August 2021 |
5.2% | 6.0% | 5.5% | 3,934 |
July 2021 |
5.4% | 6.2% | 5.7% | 4,129 |
June 2021 |
5.9% | 6.3% | 6.0% | 4,295 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩