Janesville-Beloit, Wisconsin Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Janesville fell 1.0 percentage points in November 2020 to 5.2%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.1 percentage points lower than the Wisconsin rate. The unemployment rate in Janesville peaked in April 2020 at 16.3% and is now 11.1 percentage points lower. You can also compare Janesville unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
Unemployment Rate | November 2020 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
National | 6.7% | -0.2 | +3.1 |
Wisconsin | 5.3% | -0.7 | +1.8 |
Janesville | 5.2% | -1.0 | +1.3 |
Unemployment Rate: Janesville, Wisconsin, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Janesville, Wisconsin Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Janesville peaked in April 2020 at 14,035. There are now 9,596 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Janesville employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Janesville, Wisconsin) is also available.
Unemployed Persons | November 2020 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
Janesville | 4,439 | -902 | +1,069 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Janesville, Wisconsin Unemployment History
Date | National Unemployment Rate |
Wisconsin Unemployment Rate |
Janesville Unemployment Rate |
Janesville Unemployed |
---|---|---|---|---|
December 2020 |
6.7% | 5.5% | — | — |
November 2020 |
6.7% | 5.3% | 5.2% | 4,439 |
October 2020 |
6.9% | 6.0% | 6.2% | 5,341 |
September 2020 |
7.8% | 5.4% | 6.2% | 5,347 |
August 2020 |
8.4% | 6.3% | 7.6% | 6,396 |
July 2020 |
10.2% | 7.1% | 8.1% | 6,594 |
June 2020 |
11.1% | 8.6% | 9.9% | 8,255 |
May 2020 |
13.3% | 12.1% | 14.5% | 12,220 |
April 2020 |
14.8% | 13.6% | 16.3% | 14,035 |
March 2020 |
4.4% | 3.1% | 3.9% | 3,320 |
February 2020 |
3.5% | 3.5% | 4.1% | 3,483 |
January 2020 |
3.5% | 3.5% | 4.1% | 3,491 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩