Charlottesville, Virginia Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Charlottesville fell 0.1 percentage points in November 2020 to 4.3%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.5 percentage points lower than the Virginia rate. The unemployment rate in Charlottesville peaked in April 2020 at 10.2% and is now 5.9 percentage points lower. You can also compare Charlottesville unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
Unemployment Rate | November 2020 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
National | 6.7% | -0.2 | +3.1 |
Virginia | 4.8% | -0.4 | +2.1 |
Charlottesville | 4.3% | -0.1 | +1.9 |
Unemployment Rate: Charlottesville, Virginia, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Charlottesville, Virginia Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Charlottesville peaked in April 2020 at 12,152. There are now 6,951 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Charlottesville employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Charlottesville, Virginia) is also available.
Unemployed Persons | November 2020 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
Charlottesville | 5,201 | -84 | +2,258 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Charlottesville, Virginia Unemployment History
Date | National Unemployment Rate |
Virginia Unemployment Rate |
Charlottesville Unemployment Rate |
Charlottesville Unemployed |
---|---|---|---|---|
December 2020 |
6.7% | 4.9% | — | — |
November 2020 |
6.7% | 4.8% | 4.3% | 5,201 |
October 2020 |
6.9% | 5.2% | 4.4% | 5,285 |
September 2020 |
7.8% | 6.2% | 5.5% | 6,505 |
August 2020 |
8.4% | 6.1% | 5.3% | 6,530 |
July 2020 |
10.2% | 7.9% | 7.2% | 8,747 |
June 2020 |
11.1% | 8.1% | 7.7% | 9,259 |
May 2020 |
13.3% | 9.0% | 8.3% | 9,994 |
April 2020 |
14.8% | 11.2% | 10.2% | 12,152 |
March 2020 |
4.4% | 3.3% | 3.0% | 3,701 |
February 2020 |
3.5% | 2.6% | 2.3% | 2,920 |
January 2020 |
3.5% | 2.7% | 2.4% | 2,960 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩