Rapid City, South Dakota Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Rapid City fell 0.1 percentage points in January 2023 to 2.2%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.1 percentage points higher than the South Dakota rate. The unemployment rate in Rapid City peaked in April 2020 at 11.0% and is now 8.8 percentage points lower. You can also compare Rapid City unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
Unemployment Rate | January 2023 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
National | 3.4% | -0.1 | -0.6 |
South Dakota | 2.1% | -0.1 | +0.1 |
Rapid City | 2.2% | -0.1 | -0.6 |
Unemployment Rate: Rapid City, South Dakota, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Rapid City, South Dakota Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Rapid City peaked in April 2020 at 8,185. There are now 6,473 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Rapid City employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Rapid City, South Dakota) is also available.
Unemployed Persons | January 2023 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
Rapid City | 1,712 | -102 | -451 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Rapid City, South Dakota Unemployment History
Date | National Unemployment Rate |
South Dakota Unemployment Rate |
Rapid City Unemployment Rate |
Rapid City Unemployed |
---|---|---|---|---|
February 2023 |
3.6% | — | — | — |
January 2023 |
3.4% | 2.1% | 2.2% | 1,712 |
December 2022 |
3.5% | 2.2% | 2.3% | 1,814 |
November 2022 |
3.6% | 2.2% | 2.4% | 1,870 |
October 2022 |
3.7% | 2.2% | 2.4% | 1,871 |
September 2022 |
3.5% | 2.2% | 2.4% | 1,847 |
August 2022 |
3.7% | 2.2% | 2.3% | 1,842 |
July 2022 |
3.5% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 1,820 |
June 2022 |
3.6% | 2.0% | 2.3% | 1,813 |
May 2022 |
3.6% | 2.0% | 2.3% | 1,804 |
April 2022 |
3.6% | 1.9% | 2.4% | 1,838 |
March 2022 |
3.6% | 1.9% | 2.5% | 1,938 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩