Lancaster, Pennsylvania Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Lancaster fell 0.7 percentage points in November 2020 to 4.7%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.9 percentage points lower than the Pennsylvania rate. The unemployment rate in Lancaster peaked in April 2020 at 15.2% and is now 10.5 percentage points lower. You can also compare Lancaster unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
Unemployment Rate | November 2020 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
National | 6.7% | -0.2 | +3.1 |
Pennsylvania | 6.6% | -0.8 | +2.0 |
Lancaster | 4.7% | -0.7 | +1.0 |
Unemployment Rate: Lancaster, Pennsylvania, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Lancaster, Pennsylvania Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Lancaster peaked in April 2020 at 42,484. There are now 29,056 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Lancaster employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Lancaster, Pennsylvania) is also available.
Unemployed Persons | November 2020 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
Lancaster | 13,428 | -2,270 | +2,666 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Lancaster, Pennsylvania Unemployment History
Date | National Unemployment Rate |
Pennsylvania Unemployment Rate |
Lancaster Unemployment Rate |
Lancaster Unemployed |
---|---|---|---|---|
December 2020 |
6.7% | — | — | — |
November 2020 |
6.7% | 6.6% | 4.7% | 13,428 |
October 2020 |
6.9% | 7.4% | 5.4% | 15,698 |
September 2020 |
7.8% | 8.3% | 6.2% | 18,035 |
August 2020 |
8.4% | 10.4% | 8.0% | 22,858 |
July 2020 |
10.2% | 12.5% | 10.0% | 28,938 |
June 2020 |
11.1% | 13.2% | 11.3% | 32,646 |
May 2020 |
13.3% | 13.4% | 11.7% | 34,166 |
April 2020 |
14.8% | 16.1% | 15.2% | 42,484 |
March 2020 |
4.4% | 5.8% | 4.4% | 12,497 |
February 2020 |
3.5% | 4.7% | 3.7% | 10,617 |
January 2020 |
3.5% | 4.7% | 3.7% | 10,612 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩