Grand Forks, North Dakota Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Grand Forks fell 0.2 percentage points in April 2022 to 2.3%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.5 percentage points lower than the North Dakota rate. The unemployment rate in Grand Forks peaked in April 2020 at 7.9% and is now 5.6 percentage points lower. You can also compare Grand Forks unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
Unemployment Rate | April 2022 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
National | 3.6% | 0.0 | -2.4 |
North Dakota | 2.8% | -0.1 | -1.2 |
Grand Forks | 2.3% | -0.2 | -1.4 |
Unemployment Rate: Grand Forks, North Dakota, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Grand Forks, North Dakota Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Grand Forks peaked in May 2020 at 4,266. There are now 3,039 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Grand Forks employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Grand Forks, North Dakota) is also available.
Unemployed Persons | April 2022 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
Grand Forks | 1,227 | -94 | -717 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Grand Forks, North Dakota Unemployment History
Date | National Unemployment Rate |
North Dakota Unemployment Rate |
Grand Forks Unemployment Rate |
Grand Forks Unemployed |
---|---|---|---|---|
May 2022 |
3.6% | — | — | — |
April 2022 |
3.6% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1,227 |
March 2022 |
3.6% | 2.9% | 2.5% | 1,321 |
February 2022 |
3.8% | 2.9% | 2.6% | 1,398 |
January 2022 |
4.0% | 3.1% | 2.8% | 1,501 |
December 2021 |
3.9% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 1,573 |
November 2021 |
4.2% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 1,567 |
October 2021 |
4.6% | 3.2% | 3.0% | 1,571 |
September 2021 |
4.7% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 1,619 |
August 2021 |
5.2% | 3.3% | 3.2% | 1,690 |
July 2021 |
5.4% | 3.4% | 3.3% | 1,768 |
June 2021 |
5.9% | 3.6% | 3.5% | 1,837 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩