Glens Falls, New York Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Glens Falls fell 1.2 percentage points in November 2020 to 4.7%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 3.7 percentage points lower than the New York rate. The unemployment rate in Glens Falls peaked in April 2020 at 15.8% and is now 11.1 percentage points lower. You can also compare Glens Falls unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
Unemployment Rate | November 2020 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
National | 6.7% | -0.2 | +3.1 |
New York | 8.4% | -0.8 | +4.5 |
Glens Falls | 4.7% | -1.2 | +0.3 |
Unemployment Rate: Glens Falls, New York, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Glens Falls, New York Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Glens Falls peaked in April 2020 at 9,237. There are now 6,550 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Glens Falls employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Glens Falls, New York) is also available.
Unemployed Persons | November 2020 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
Glens Falls | 2,687 | -631 | +48 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Glens Falls, New York Unemployment History
Date | National Unemployment Rate |
New York Unemployment Rate |
Glens Falls Unemployment Rate |
Glens Falls Unemployed |
---|---|---|---|---|
December 2020 |
6.7% | 8.2% | — | — |
November 2020 |
6.7% | 8.4% | 4.7% | 2,687 |
October 2020 |
6.9% | 9.2% | 5.9% | 3,318 |
September 2020 |
7.8% | 9.7% | 5.9% | 3,314 |
August 2020 |
8.4% | 12.5% | 9.3% | 5,348 |
July 2020 |
10.2% | 15.9% | 12.3% | 7,152 |
June 2020 |
11.1% | 15.6% | 11.8% | 6,672 |
May 2020 |
13.3% | 14.5% | 11.8% | 7,027 |
April 2020 |
14.8% | 15.3% | 15.8% | 9,237 |
March 2020 |
4.4% | 4.1% | 4.7% | 2,816 |
February 2020 |
3.5% | 3.7% | 4.2% | 2,491 |
January 2020 |
3.5% | 3.8% | 4.3% | 2,589 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩