Pocatello, Idaho Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Pocatello rose 0.1 percentage points in November 2022 to 2.9%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.1 percentage points lower than the Idaho rate. The unemployment rate in Pocatello peaked in April 2020 at 9.7% and is now 6.8 percentage points lower. From a post peak low of 2.6% in May 2022, the unemployment rate has now grown by 0.3 percentage points. You can also compare Pocatello unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
Unemployment Rate | November 2022 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
National | 3.6% | -0.1 | -0.6 |
Idaho | 3.0% | +0.1 | -0.2 |
Pocatello | 2.9% | +0.1 | -0.2 |
Unemployment Rate: Pocatello, Idaho, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Pocatello, Idaho Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Pocatello peaked in April 2020 at 3,970. There are now 2,682 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. From a recent trough of 1,160 in May 2022, the number of unemployed has now grown by 128.
Unemployed Persons | November 2022 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
Pocatello | 1,288 | +21 | -58 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Pocatello, Idaho Unemployment History
Date | National Unemployment Rate |
Idaho Unemployment Rate |
Pocatello Unemployment Rate |
Pocatello Unemployed |
---|---|---|---|---|
December 2022 |
3.5% | — | — | — |
November 2022 |
3.6% | 3.0% | 2.9% | 1,288 |
October 2022 |
3.7% | 2.9% | 2.8% | 1,267 |
September 2022 |
3.5% | 2.8% | 2.7% | 1,226 |
August 2022 |
3.7% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 1,191 |
July 2022 |
3.5% | 2.6% | 2.6% | 1,164 |
June 2022 |
3.6% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 1,164 |
May 2022 |
3.6% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 1,160 |
April 2022 |
3.6% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 1,184 |
March 2022 |
3.6% | 2.7% | 2.8% | 1,221 |
February 2022 |
3.8% | 2.8% | 2.9% | 1,259 |
January 2022 |
4.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% | 1,302 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩