Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, Connecticut Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Hartford fell 0.1 percentage points in January 2023 to 3.9%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.0 percentage points lower than the Connecticut rate. The unemployment rate in Hartford peaked in May 2020 at 11.1% and is now 7.2 percentage points lower. You can also compare Hartford unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
Unemployment Rate | January 2023 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
National | 3.4% | -0.1 | -0.6 |
Connecticut | 3.9% | -0.1 | -0.9 |
Hartford | 3.9% | -0.1 | -1.1 |
Unemployment Rate: Hartford, Connecticut, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Hartford, Connecticut Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Hartford peaked in May 2020 at 70,064. There are now 45,823 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Hartford employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Hartford, Connecticut) is also available.
Unemployed Persons | January 2023 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
Hartford | 24,241 | -474 | -6,354 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Hartford, Connecticut Unemployment History
Date | National Unemployment Rate |
Connecticut Unemployment Rate |
Hartford Unemployment Rate |
Hartford Unemployed |
---|---|---|---|---|
February 2023 |
3.6% | — | — | — |
January 2023 |
3.4% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 24,241 |
December 2022 |
3.5% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 24,715 |
November 2022 |
3.6% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 25,074 |
October 2022 |
3.7% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 24,922 |
September 2022 |
3.5% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 24,708 |
August 2022 |
3.7% | 3.9% | 4.0% | 24,657 |
July 2022 |
3.5% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 24,710 |
June 2022 |
3.6% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 25,104 |
May 2022 |
3.6% | 4.1% | 4.2% | 25,895 |
April 2022 |
3.6% | 4.2% | 4.3% | 26,747 |
March 2022 |
3.6% | 4.3% | 4.5% | 27,935 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩