Reno-Sparks, Nevada Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Reno fell 0.6 percentage points in December 2011 to 11.8%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.8 percentage points lower than the Nevada rate. The unemployment rate in Reno peaked in May 2010 at 14.3% and is now 2.5 percentage points lower. You can also compare Reno unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.5% | -0.2 | -0.9 |
| Nevada | 12.6% | -0.4 | -2.3 |
| Reno | 11.8% | -0.6 | -2.2 |
Unemployment Rate: Reno, Nevada, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Reno, Nevada Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Reno peaked in June 2010 at 32,105. There are now 6,802 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Reno employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Reno, Nevada) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reno | 25,303 | -1,129 | -5,561 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Reno, Nevada Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Nevada Unemployment Rate |
Reno Unemployment Rate |
Reno Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | — | — | — |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 12.6% | 11.8% | 25,303 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 13.0% | 12.4% | 26,432 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 13.4% | 12.8% | 27,436 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 13.4% | 12.9% | 27,547 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 13.4% | 12.9% | 27,631 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 12.9% | 12.6% | 26,981 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 12.4% | 12.2% | 26,242 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 12.1% | 11.9% | 25,652 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 12.5% | 12.1% | 26,244 |
|
March 2011 |
8.9% | 13.2% | 12.6% | 27,432 |
|
February 2011 |
9.0% | 13.6% | 12.8% | 27,957 |
|
January 2011 |
9.1% | 14.2% | 13.3% | 29,176 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
