Grants Pass, Oregon Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Grants Pass fell 0.2 percentage points in March 2022 to 4.8%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.0 percentage points higher than the Oregon rate. The unemployment rate in Grants Pass peaked in March 2009 at 14.7% and is now 9.9 percentage points lower. From a post peak low of 4.3% in November 2019, the unemployment rate has now grown by 0.5 percentage points. You can also compare Grants Pass unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
Unemployment Rate | March 2022 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
National | 3.6% | -0.2 | -2.4 |
Oregon | 3.8% | -0.2 | -2.3 |
Grants Pass | 4.8% | -0.2 | -2.2 |
Unemployment Rate: Grants Pass, Oregon, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Grants Pass, Oregon Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Grants Pass peaked in March 2009 at 5,212. There are now 3,419 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. From a recent trough of 1,536 in December 2019, the number of unemployed has now grown by 257.
Unemployed Persons | March 2022 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
Grants Pass | 1,793 | -52 | -804 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Grants Pass, Oregon Unemployment History
Date | National Unemployment Rate |
Oregon Unemployment Rate |
Grants Pass Unemployment Rate |
Grants Pass Unemployed |
---|---|---|---|---|
April 2022 |
3.6% | — | — | — |
March 2022 |
3.6% | 3.8% | 4.8% | 1,793 |
February 2022 |
3.8% | 4.0% | 5.0% | 1,845 |
January 2022 |
4.0% | 4.2% | 5.2% | 1,924 |
December 2021 |
3.9% | 4.2% | 5.3% | 1,966 |
November 2021 |
4.2% | 4.2% | 5.3% | 1,952 |
October 2021 |
4.6% | 4.4% | 5.3% | 1,956 |
September 2021 |
4.7% | 4.5% | 5.5% | 2,027 |
August 2021 |
5.2% | 4.9% | 5.8% | 2,137 |
July 2021 |
5.4% | 5.1% | 6.1% | 2,265 |
June 2021 |
5.9% | 5.4% | 6.5% | 2,386 |
May 2021 |
5.8% | 5.6% | 6.7% | 2,484 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩