Sierra Vista-Douglas, Arizona Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Sierra Vista fell 0.1 percentage points in January 2023 to 4.2%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.4 percentage points higher than the Arizona rate. The unemployment rate in Sierra Vista peaked in April 2020 at 11.1% and is now 6.9 percentage points lower. From a post peak low of 3.4% in April 2022, the unemployment rate has now grown by 0.8 percentage points. You can also compare Sierra Vista unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
Unemployment Rate | January 2023 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
National | 3.4% | -0.1 | -0.6 |
Arizona | 3.8% | -0.2 | +0.2 |
Sierra Vista | 4.2% | -0.1 | +0.4 |
Unemployment Rate: Sierra Vista, Arizona, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Sierra Vista, Arizona Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Sierra Vista peaked in June 2011 at 5,712. There are now 3,630 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. From a recent trough of 1,659 in April 2022, the number of unemployed has now grown by 423.
Unemployed Persons | January 2023 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
Sierra Vista | 2,082 | -53 | +201 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Sierra Vista, Arizona Unemployment History
Date | National Unemployment Rate |
Arizona Unemployment Rate |
Sierra Vista Unemployment Rate |
Sierra Vista Unemployed |
---|---|---|---|---|
February 2023 |
3.6% | — | — | — |
January 2023 |
3.4% | 3.8% | 4.2% | 2,082 |
December 2022 |
3.5% | 4.0% | 4.3% | 2,135 |
November 2022 |
3.6% | 4.0% | 4.4% | 2,141 |
October 2022 |
3.7% | 4.1% | 4.3% | 2,083 |
September 2022 |
3.5% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 1,956 |
August 2022 |
3.7% | 4.0% | 3.8% | 1,839 |
July 2022 |
3.5% | 3.9% | 3.6% | 1,756 |
June 2022 |
3.6% | 3.8% | 3.5% | 1,702 |
May 2022 |
3.6% | 3.7% | 3.4% | 1,671 |
April 2022 |
3.6% | 3.6% | 3.4% | 1,659 |
March 2022 |
3.6% | 3.6% | 3.5% | 1,706 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩