Department of Numbers

Lake Havasu City-Kingman, Arizona Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Lake Havasu City fell 5.4 percentage points in August 2020 to 7.2%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.3 percentage points higher than the Arizona rate. The unemployment rate in Lake Havasu City peaked in April 2020 at 19.8% and is now 12.6 percentage points lower. You can also compare Lake Havasu City unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate August 2020 Month/Month Year/Year
National 8.4% -1.8 +4.7
Arizona 5.9% -4.8 +1.3
Lake Havasu City 7.2% -5.4 +1.6
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with August 2020 data as September metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Lake Havasu City, Arizona, National

Lake Havasu City, Arizona monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Lake Havasu City, Arizona Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Lake Havasu City peaked in April 2020 at 17,103. There are now 11,237 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Lake Havasu City employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Lake Havasu City, Arizona) is also available.

Unemployed Persons August 2020 Month/Month Year/Year
Lake Havasu City 5,866 -5,011 +941

Number of Unemployed Persons

Lake Havasu City, Arizona Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
Arizona
Unemployment Rate
Lake Havasu City
Unemployment Rate
Lake Havasu City
Unemployed
September
2020
7.9%
August
2020
8.4% 5.9% 7.2% 5,866
July
2020
10.2% 10.7% 12.6% 10,877
June
2020
11.1% 10.0% 12.8% 10,883
May
2020
13.3% 9.0% 14.2% 12,458
April
2020
14.7% 13.4% 19.8% 17,103
March
2020
4.4% 6.1% 7.7% 6,805
February
2020
3.5% 4.5% 5.4% 4,847
January
2020
3.6% 4.5% 5.5% 4,859
December
2019
3.5% 4.5% 5.4% 4,851
November
2019
3.5% 4.5% 5.4% 4,851
October
2019
3.6% 4.5% 5.5% 4,862

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.