Department of Numbers

La Crosse, Wisconsin Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for La Crosse fell 0.1 percentage points in March 2012 to 5.3%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.5 percentage points lower than the Wisconsin rate. The unemployment rate in La Crosse peaked in August 2009 at 7.5% and is now 2.2 percentage points lower. You can also compare La Crosse unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
National 8.2% -0.1 -0.7
Wisconsin 6.8% -0.1 -0.8
La Crosse 5.3% -0.1 -0.4
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with March 2012 data as April metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: La Crosse, Wisconsin, National

La Crosse, Wisconsin monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

La Crosse, Wisconsin Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in La Crosse peaked in September 2009 at 5,776. There are now 1,713 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. La Crosse employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in La Crosse, Wisconsin) is also available.

Unemployed Persons March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
La Crosse 4,063 -65 -235

Number of Unemployed Persons

La Crosse, Wisconsin Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
Wisconsin
Unemployment Rate
La Crosse
Unemployment Rate
La Crosse
Unemployed
April
2012
8.1% 6.7%
March
2012
8.2% 6.8% 5.3% 4,063
February
2012
8.3% 6.9% 5.4% 4,128
January
2012
8.3% 6.9% 5.5% 4,227
December
2011
8.5% 7.0% 5.7% 4,412
November
2011
8.7% 7.1% 6.0% 4,641
October
2011
8.9% 7.3% 6.3% 4,821
September
2011
9.0% 7.4% 6.4% 4,876
August
2011
9.1% 7.6% 6.4% 4,842
July
2011
9.1% 7.6% 6.3% 4,802
June
2011
9.1% 7.6% 6.2% 4,698
May
2011
9.0% 7.6% 6.0% 4,544
April
2011
9.0% 7.5% 5.8% 4,378

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.