Department of Numbers

Appleton, Wisconsin Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Appleton fell 0.4 percentage points in July 2010 to 7.2%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.6 percentage points lower than the Wisconsin rate. The unemployment rate in Appleton peaked in May 2009 at 8.9% and is now 1.1 percentage points lower.

Unemployment Rate July 2010 Month/Month Year/Year
National 9.5% 0.0 +0.1
Wisconsin 7.8% -0.1 -1.1
Appleton 7.2% -0.4 -1.2
Note: Metro level data is not seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with July 2010 data as August metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Appleton, Wisconsin, National

Appleton, Wisconsin monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Appleton, Wisconsin Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Appleton peaked in March 2009 at 11,430. There are now 2,388 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. From a recent trough of 8,753 in May 2010, the number of unemployed has now grown by 289. Appleton employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Appleton, Wisconsin) is also available.

Unemployed Persons July 2010 Month/Month Year/Year
Appleton 9,042 -428 -1,600

Number of Unemployed Persons

Appleton, Wisconsin Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
Wisconsin
Unemployment Rate
Appleton
Unemployment Rate
Appleton
Unemployed
August
2010
9.6%
July
2010
9.5% 7.8% 7.2% 9,042
June
2010
9.5% 7.9% 7.6% 9,470
May
2010
9.7% 8.2% 7.1% 8,753
April
2010
9.9% 8.5% 7.6% 9,324
March
2010
9.7% 8.8% 9.2% 11,170
February
2010
9.7% 8.7% 9.0% 11,001
January
2010
9.7% 8.7% 9.0% 11,038
December
2009
10.0% 8.5% 7.8% 9,512
November
2009
10.0% 8.6% 7.4% 8,992
October
2009
10.1% 8.7% 7.5% 9,185
September
2009
9.8% 8.8% 7.6% 9,279
August
2009
9.7% 8.8% 8.1% 10,165

1. Metro area unemployment rates are not seasonally adjusted while state and national rates are. In practice this means the metro rates may be noisier on a month-to-month basis than the state and national series due to seasonal effects. It's probably better to use year-over-year comparisons.