Department of Numbers

Charlottesville, Virginia Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Charlottesville fell 0.1 percentage points in March 2013 to 4.7%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.6 percentage points lower than the Virginia rate. The unemployment rate in Charlottesville peaked in December 2009 at 6.3% and is now 1.6 percentage points lower. You can also compare Charlottesville unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate March 2013 Month/Month Year/Year
National 7.6% -0.1 -0.6
Virginia 5.3% -0.3 -0.6
Charlottesville 4.7% -0.1 -0.5
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with March 2013 data as April metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Charlottesville, Virginia, National

Charlottesville, Virginia monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Charlottesville, Virginia Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Charlottesville peaked in February 2010 at 6,746. There are now 1,784 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Charlottesville employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Charlottesville, Virginia) is also available.

Unemployed Persons March 2013 Month/Month Year/Year
Charlottesville 4,962 -193 -691

Number of Unemployed Persons

Charlottesville, Virginia Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
Virginia
Unemployment Rate
Charlottesville
Unemployment Rate
Charlottesville
Unemployed
April
2013
7.5% 5.2%
March
2013
7.6% 5.3% 4.7% 4,962
February
2013
7.7% 5.6% 4.8% 5,155
January
2013
7.9% 5.6% 4.9% 5,264
December
2012
7.8% 5.6% 4.9% 5,297
November
2012
7.8% 5.7% 4.9% 5,322
October
2012
7.9% 5.8% 4.9% 5,356
September
2012
7.8% 5.9% 5.0% 5,399
August
2012
8.1% 5.9% 5.0% 5,447
July
2012
8.2% 6.0% 5.0% 5,499
June
2012
8.2% 6.0% 5.1% 5,548
May
2012
8.2% 5.9% 5.1% 5,590
April
2012
8.1% 5.9% 5.1% 5,623

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.