Wichita Falls, Texas Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Wichita Falls fell 0.2 percentage points in March 2012 to 6.4%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.6 percentage points lower than the Texas rate. The unemployment rate in Wichita Falls peaked in December 2009 at 8.0% and is now 1.6 percentage points lower. You can also compare Wichita Falls unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.2% | -0.1 | -0.7 |
| Texas | 7.0% | -0.1 | -1.0 |
| Wichita Falls | 6.4% | -0.2 | -0.9 |
Unemployment Rate: Wichita Falls, Texas, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Wichita Falls, Texas Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Wichita Falls peaked in February 2010 at 5,857. There are now 1,238 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Wichita Falls employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Wichita Falls, Texas) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wichita Falls | 4,619 | -98 | -674 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Wichita Falls, Texas Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Texas Unemployment Rate |
Wichita Falls Unemployment Rate |
Wichita Falls Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 2012 |
8.1% | 6.9% | — | — |
|
March 2012 |
8.2% | 7.0% | 6.4% | 4,619 |
|
February 2012 |
8.3% | 7.1% | 6.6% | 4,717 |
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | 7.3% | 6.9% | 4,902 |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 7.4% | 7.1% | 5,105 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 7.6% | 7.3% | 5,218 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 7.8% | 7.5% | 5,380 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 7.9% | 7.5% | 5,352 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 8.1% | 7.4% | 5,295 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 8.1% | 7.4% | 5,291 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 8.1% | 7.3% | 5,237 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 8.1% | 7.3% | 5,248 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 8.0% | 7.3% | 5,252 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩

