Memphis, Tennessee Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Memphis fell 0.4 percentage points in December 2011 to 9.6%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.9 percentage points higher than the Tennessee rate. The unemployment rate in Memphis peaked in June 2011 at 10.5% and is now 0.9 percentage points lower. You can also compare Memphis unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.5% | -0.2 | -0.9 |
| Tennessee | 8.7% | -0.4 | -0.7 |
| Memphis | 9.6% | -0.4 | -0.2 |
Unemployment Rate: Memphis, Tennessee, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Memphis, Tennessee Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Memphis peaked in September 2011 at 65,644. There are now 5,421 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Memphis employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Memphis, Tennessee) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memphis | 60,223 | -2,778 | +891 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Memphis, Tennessee Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Tennessee Unemployment Rate |
Memphis Unemployment Rate |
Memphis Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | — | — | — |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 8.7% | 9.6% | 60,223 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 9.1% | 10.0% | 63,001 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 9.5% | 10.4% | 65,140 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 9.8% | 10.5% | 65,644 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 9.7% | 10.4% | 64,844 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 9.8% | 10.5% | 65,268 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 9.8% | 10.5% | 65,186 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 9.7% | 10.3% | 63,882 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 9.6% | 10.1% | 62,376 |
|
March 2011 |
8.9% | 9.5% | 9.9% | 60,561 |
|
February 2011 |
9.0% | 9.5% | 9.9% | 60,489 |
|
January 2011 |
9.1% | 9.4% | 9.8% | 59,422 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
