Johnson City, Tennessee Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Johnson City fell 0.5 percentage points in December 2011 to 7.8%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.9 percentage points lower than the Tennessee rate. The unemployment rate in Johnson City peaked in July 2009 at 9.7% and is now 1.9 percentage points lower. You can also compare Johnson City unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.5% | -0.2 | -0.9 |
| Tennessee | 8.7% | -0.4 | -0.7 |
| Johnson City | 7.8% | -0.5 | -0.9 |
Unemployment Rate: Johnson City, Tennessee, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Johnson City, Tennessee Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Johnson City peaked in August 2009 at 9,788. There are now 1,834 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Johnson City employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Johnson City, Tennessee) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson City | 7,954 | -474 | -899 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Johnson City, Tennessee Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Tennessee Unemployment Rate |
Johnson City Unemployment Rate |
Johnson City Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | — | — | — |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 8.7% | 7.8% | 7,954 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 9.1% | 8.3% | 8,428 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 9.5% | 8.7% | 8,845 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 9.8% | 8.9% | 9,171 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 9.7% | 8.8% | 9,119 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 9.8% | 8.9% | 9,174 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 9.8% | 8.9% | 9,237 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 9.7% | 8.8% | 9,039 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 9.6% | 8.7% | 8,908 |
|
March 2011 |
8.9% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 8,728 |
|
February 2011 |
9.0% | 9.5% | 8.8% | 8,901 |
|
January 2011 |
9.1% | 9.4% | 8.8% | 8,915 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
