Department of Numbers

Johnson City, Tennessee Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Johnson City fell 0.2 percentage points in March 2012 to 6.8%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.1 percentage points lower than the Tennessee rate. The unemployment rate in Johnson City peaked in July 2009 at 9.7% and is now 2.9 percentage points lower. You can also compare Johnson City unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
National 8.2% -0.1 -0.7
Tennessee 7.9% -0.1 -1.5
Johnson City 6.8% -0.2 -1.8
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with March 2012 data as April metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Johnson City, Tennessee, National

Johnson City, Tennessee monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Johnson City, Tennessee Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Johnson City peaked in August 2009 at 9,788. There are now 2,894 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Johnson City employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Johnson City, Tennessee) is also available.

Unemployed Persons March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
Johnson City 6,894 -278 -1,834

Number of Unemployed Persons

Johnson City, Tennessee Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
Tennessee
Unemployment Rate
Johnson City
Unemployment Rate
Johnson City
Unemployed
April
2012
8.1% 7.8%
March
2012
8.2% 7.9% 6.8% 6,894
February
2012
8.3% 8.0% 7.0% 7,172
January
2012
8.3% 8.2% 7.4% 7,511
December
2011
8.5% 8.5% 7.8% 7,954
November
2011
8.7% 8.7% 8.3% 8,428
October
2011
8.9% 8.9% 8.7% 8,845
September
2011
9.0% 9.1% 8.9% 9,171
August
2011
9.1% 9.2% 8.8% 9,119
July
2011
9.1% 9.4% 8.9% 9,174
June
2011
9.1% 9.4% 8.9% 9,237
May
2011
9.0% 9.4% 8.8% 9,039
April
2011
9.0% 9.4% 8.7% 8,908

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.