Sumter, South Carolina Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Sumter fell 0.4 percentage points in December 2011 to 10.4%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.9 percentage points higher than the South Carolina rate. The unemployment rate in Sumter peaked in June 2009 at 12.7% and is now 2.3 percentage points lower. You can also compare Sumter unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.5% | -0.2 | -0.9 |
| South Carolina | 9.5% | -0.4 | -1.4 |
| Sumter | 10.4% | -0.4 | -1.2 |
Unemployment Rate: Sumter, South Carolina, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Sumter, South Carolina Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Sumter peaked in July 2009 at 5,784. There are now 1,079 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Sumter employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Sumter, South Carolina) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sumter | 4,705 | -185 | -576 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Sumter, South Carolina Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
South Carolina Unemployment Rate |
Sumter Unemployment Rate |
Sumter Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | — | — | — |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 9.5% | 10.4% | 4,705 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 9.9% | 10.8% | 4,890 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 10.5% | 11.5% | 5,205 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 10.9% | 11.9% | 5,426 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 11.1% | 12.1% | 5,533 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 10.9% | 12.0% | 5,496 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 10.5% | 11.6% | 5,298 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 10.0% | 11.0% | 5,032 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 9.8% | 10.6% | 4,818 |
|
March 2011 |
8.9% | 9.9% | 10.7% | 4,821 |
|
February 2011 |
9.0% | 10.2% | 10.9% | 4,927 |
|
January 2011 |
9.1% | 10.5% | 11.2% | 5,070 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
