Department of Numbers

Reading, Pennsylvania Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Reading fell 0.1 percentage points in March 2012 to 7.6%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.1 percentage points higher than the Pennsylvania rate. The unemployment rate in Reading peaked in February 2010 at 9.5% and is now 1.9 percentage points lower. You can also compare Reading unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
National 8.2% -0.1 -0.7
Pennsylvania 7.5% -0.1 -0.4
Reading 7.6% -0.1 -0.4
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with March 2012 data as April metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Reading, Pennsylvania, National

Reading, Pennsylvania monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Reading, Pennsylvania Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Reading peaked in February 2010 at 19,209. There are now 3,665 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Reading employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Reading, Pennsylvania) is also available.

Unemployed Persons March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
Reading 15,544 -74 -777

Number of Unemployed Persons

Reading, Pennsylvania Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
Pennsylvania
Unemployment Rate
Reading
Unemployment Rate
Reading
Unemployed
April
2012
8.1% 7.4%
March
2012
8.2% 7.5% 7.6% 15,544
February
2012
8.3% 7.6% 7.7% 15,618
January
2012
8.3% 7.6% 7.8% 15,775
December
2011
8.5% 7.7% 7.8% 15,920
November
2011
8.7% 7.8% 8.0% 16,398
October
2011
8.9% 7.9% 8.2% 16,838
September
2011
9.0% 8.0% 8.4% 17,234
August
2011
9.1% 8.1% 8.4% 17,070
July
2011
9.1% 8.1% 8.0% 16,319
June
2011
9.1% 8.0% 7.8% 15,798
May
2011
9.0% 8.0% 7.7% 15,547
April
2011
9.0% 7.9% 7.8% 15,780

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.