Lawton, Oklahoma Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Lawton fell 0.3 percentage points in March 2012 to 7.0%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.6 percentage points higher than the Oklahoma rate. The unemployment rate in Lawton peaked in February 2012 at 7.3% and is now 0.3 percentage points lower. You can also compare Lawton unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.2% | -0.1 | -0.7 |
| Oklahoma | 5.4% | -0.6 | -0.5 |
| Lawton | 7.0% | -0.3 | +0.7 |
Unemployment Rate: Lawton, Oklahoma, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Lawton, Oklahoma Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Lawton peaked in February 2012 at 3,441. There are now 142 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Lawton employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Lawton, Oklahoma) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lawton | 3,299 | -142 | +282 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Lawton, Oklahoma Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Oklahoma Unemployment Rate |
Lawton Unemployment Rate |
Lawton Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 2012 |
8.1% | 5.0% | — | — |
|
March 2012 |
8.2% | 5.4% | 7.0% | 3,299 |
|
February 2012 |
8.3% | 6.0% | 7.3% | 3,441 |
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | 6.1% | 7.1% | 3,303 |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 6.3% | 6.8% | 3,132 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 6.3% | 6.5% | 3,050 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 6.3% | 6.4% | 3,009 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 6.3% | 6.2% | 2,882 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 6.3% | 5.8% | 2,726 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 6.2% | 5.8% | 2,698 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 6.1% | 5.6% | 2,630 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 5.9% | 5.5% | 2,639 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 2,807 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
