Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, North Carolina Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Hickory fell 0.3 percentage points in March 2012 to 11.2%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.5 percentage points higher than the North Carolina rate. The unemployment rate in Hickory peaked in December 2009 at 15.0% and is now 3.8 percentage points lower. You can also compare Hickory unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.2% | -0.1 | -0.7 |
| North Carolina | 9.7% | -0.2 | -0.7 |
| Hickory | 11.2% | -0.3 | -0.6 |
Unemployment Rate: Hickory, North Carolina, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Hickory, North Carolina Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Hickory peaked in May 2009 at 25,759. There are now 6,852 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Hickory employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Hickory, North Carolina) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hickory | 18,907 | -371 | -397 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Hickory, North Carolina Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
North Carolina Unemployment Rate |
Hickory Unemployment Rate |
Hickory Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 2012 |
8.1% | 9.4% | — | — |
|
March 2012 |
8.2% | 9.7% | 11.2% | 18,907 |
|
February 2012 |
8.3% | 9.9% | 11.5% | 19,278 |
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | 10.2% | 11.9% | 19,757 |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 10.4% | 12.2% | 19,878 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 10.4% | 12.3% | 20,129 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 10.6% | 12.5% | 20,585 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 10.7% | 12.6% | 20,716 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 10.7% | 12.4% | 20,381 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 10.7% | 12.2% | 19,920 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 10.6% | 12.1% | 19,717 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 10.5% | 11.8% | 19,247 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 10.4% | 11.8% | 19,210 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
