Asheville, North Carolina Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Asheville fell 0.2 percentage points in March 2013 to 7.3%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.9 percentage points lower than the North Carolina rate. The unemployment rate in Asheville peaked in January 2010 at 9.2% and is now 1.9 percentage points lower. You can also compare Asheville unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | March 2013 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 7.6% | -0.1 | -0.6 |
| North Carolina | 9.2% | -0.2 | -0.2 |
| Asheville | 7.3% | -0.2 | -0.4 |
Unemployment Rate: Asheville, North Carolina, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Asheville, North Carolina Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Asheville peaked in February 2010 at 19,636. There are now 3,550 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Asheville employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Asheville, North Carolina) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | March 2013 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asheville | 16,086 | -541 | -465 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Asheville, North Carolina Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
North Carolina Unemployment Rate |
Asheville Unemployment Rate |
Asheville Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 2013 |
7.5% | 8.9% | — | — |
|
March 2013 |
7.6% | 9.2% | 7.3% | 16,086 |
|
February 2013 |
7.7% | 9.4% | 7.5% | 16,627 |
|
January 2013 |
7.9% | 9.5% | 7.7% | 17,015 |
|
December 2012 |
7.8% | 9.4% | 7.6% | 16,797 |
|
November 2012 |
7.8% | 9.4% | 7.6% | 16,785 |
|
October 2012 |
7.9% | 9.4% | 7.6% | 16,786 |
|
September 2012 |
7.8% | 9.5% | 7.7% | 16,804 |
|
August 2012 |
8.1% | 9.6% | 7.7% | 16,821 |
|
July 2012 |
8.2% | 9.6% | 7.7% | 16,805 |
|
June 2012 |
8.2% | 9.6% | 7.7% | 16,737 |
|
May 2012 |
8.2% | 9.5% | 7.7% | 16,641 |
|
April 2012 |
8.1% | 9.4% | 7.7% | 16,556 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩

