Santa Fe, New Mexico Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Santa Fe fell 0.1 percentage points in December 2011 to 5.2%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.4 percentage points lower than the New Mexico rate. The unemployment rate in Santa Fe peaked in December 2010 at 7.3% and is now 2.1 percentage points lower. You can also compare Santa Fe unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.5% | -0.2 | -0.9 |
| New Mexico | 6.6% | +0.1 | -2.0 |
| Santa Fe | 5.2% | -0.1 | -2.1 |
Unemployment Rate: Santa Fe, New Mexico, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Santa Fe, New Mexico Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Santa Fe peaked in January 2011 at 5,653. There are now 1,686 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Santa Fe employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Santa Fe, New Mexico) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Santa Fe | 3,967 | -43 | -1,684 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Santa Fe, New Mexico Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
New Mexico Unemployment Rate |
Santa Fe Unemployment Rate |
Santa Fe Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | — | — | — |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 6.6% | 5.2% | 3,967 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 6.5% | 5.3% | 4,010 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 4,101 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 6.6% | 5.5% | 4,121 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 6.6% | 5.5% | 4,124 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 6.7% | 5.6% | 4,279 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 6.8% | 5.8% | 4,456 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 6.9% | 5.9% | 4,569 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 7.6% | 6.4% | 4,962 |
|
March 2011 |
8.9% | 8.1% | 6.8% | 5,317 |
|
February 2011 |
9.0% | 8.7% | 7.3% | 5,645 |
|
January 2011 |
9.1% | 8.7% | 7.3% | 5,653 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
