St. Cloud, Minnesota Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for St Cloud fell 0.0 percentage points in March 2012 to 5.7%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.1 percentage points lower than the Minnesota rate. The unemployment rate in St Cloud peaked in June 2009 at 8.6% and is now 2.9 percentage points lower. From a post peak low of 5.7% in January 2012, the unemployment rate has now grown by 0.0 percentage points. You can also compare St Cloud unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.2% | -0.1 | -0.7 |
| Minnesota | 5.8% | +0.1 | -0.8 |
| St Cloud | 5.7% | 0.0 | -0.6 |
Unemployment Rate: St Cloud, Minnesota, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
St Cloud, Minnesota Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in St Cloud peaked in July 2009 at 9,339. There are now 3,141 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area.
| Unemployed Persons | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| St Cloud | 6,198 | -27 | -802 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
St Cloud, Minnesota Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Minnesota Unemployment Rate |
St Cloud Unemployment Rate |
St Cloud Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 2012 |
8.1% | 5.6% | — | — |
|
March 2012 |
8.2% | 5.8% | 5.7% | 6,198 |
|
February 2012 |
8.3% | 5.7% | 5.7% | 6,225 |
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | 5.6% | 5.7% | 6,235 |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 5.7% | 6.0% | 6,491 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 5.9% | 6.3% | 6,802 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 6.1% | 6.7% | 7,254 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 6.3% | 7.0% | 7,625 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 6.5% | 7.2% | 7,854 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 6.6% | 7.1% | 7,713 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 6.7% | 6.8% | 7,364 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 6.6% | 6.5% | 7,098 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 6.6% | 6.3% | 6,959 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
