Rochester, Minnesota Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Rochester fell 0.2 percentage points in December 2011 to 4.9%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.8 percentage points lower than the Minnesota rate. The unemployment rate in Rochester peaked in July 2009 at 7.0% and is now 2.1 percentage points lower. You can also compare Rochester unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.5% | -0.2 | -0.9 |
| Minnesota | 5.7% | -0.2 | -1.2 |
| Rochester | 4.9% | -0.2 | -1.0 |
Unemployment Rate: Rochester, Minnesota, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Rochester, Minnesota Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Rochester peaked in July 2009 at 7,345. There are now 2,148 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Rochester employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Rochester, Minnesota) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rochester | 5,197 | -236 | -1,086 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Rochester, Minnesota Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Minnesota Unemployment Rate |
Rochester Unemployment Rate |
Rochester Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | — | — | — |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 5.7% | 4.9% | 5,197 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 5.9% | 5.1% | 5,433 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 6.5% | 5.4% | 5,787 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 6.9% | 5.7% | 6,102 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 7.2% | 5.9% | 6,325 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 7.2% | 5.8% | 6,266 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 6.8% | 5.6% | 6,016 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 5,829 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 6.5% | 5.4% | 5,721 |
|
March 2011 |
8.9% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 5,733 |
|
February 2011 |
9.0% | 6.7% | 5.6% | 5,899 |
|
January 2011 |
9.1% | 6.7% | 5.7% | 6,041 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
