Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, Michigan Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Saginaw fell 0.1 percentage points in March 2012 to 8.4%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.1 percentage points lower than the Michigan rate. The unemployment rate in Saginaw peaked in December 2009 at 12.7% and is now 4.3 percentage points lower. You can also compare Saginaw unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.2% | -0.1 | -0.7 |
| Michigan | 8.5% | -0.3 | -2.0 |
| Saginaw | 8.4% | -0.1 | -1.4 |
Unemployment Rate: Saginaw, Michigan, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Saginaw, Michigan Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Saginaw peaked in January 2010 at 11,754. There are now 4,187 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Saginaw employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Saginaw, Michigan) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saginaw | 7,567 | -111 | -1,430 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Saginaw, Michigan Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Michigan Unemployment Rate |
Saginaw Unemployment Rate |
Saginaw Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 2012 |
8.1% | 8.3% | — | — |
|
March 2012 |
8.2% | 8.5% | 8.4% | 7,567 |
|
February 2012 |
8.3% | 8.8% | 8.5% | 7,678 |
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | 9.0% | 8.6% | 7,777 |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 9.3% | 8.8% | 8,004 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 9.6% | 9.1% | 8,281 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 9.9% | 9.6% | 8,790 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 10.2% | 9.8% | 9,051 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 10.4% | 9.8% | 9,027 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 10.6% | 9.5% | 8,772 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 10.6% | 9.5% | 8,766 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 10.6% | 9.4% | 8,656 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 10.5% | 9.5% | 8,772 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
