Bay City, Michigan Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Bay City fell 0.4 percentage points in December 2011 to 8.5%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.8 percentage points lower than the Michigan rate. The unemployment rate in Bay City peaked in December 2009 at 12.5% and is now 4.0 percentage points lower. You can also compare Bay City unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.5% | -0.2 | -0.9 |
| Michigan | 9.3% | -0.5 | -1.8 |
| Bay City | 8.5% | -0.4 | -2.3 |
Unemployment Rate: Bay City, Michigan, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Bay City, Michigan Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Bay City peaked in January 2010 at 6,729. There are now 2,200 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Bay City employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Bay City, Michigan) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bay City | 4,529 | -192 | -1,167 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Bay City, Michigan Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Michigan Unemployment Rate |
Bay City Unemployment Rate |
Bay City Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | — | — | — |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 4,529 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 9.8% | 8.9% | 4,721 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 10.6% | 9.4% | 5,036 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 11.1% | 9.7% | 5,221 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 11.2% | 9.8% | 5,240 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 10.9% | 9.5% | 5,099 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 10.5% | 9.6% | 5,129 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 10.3% | 9.5% | 5,101 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 10.2% | 9.7% | 5,171 |
|
March 2011 |
8.9% | 10.3% | 9.8% | 5,251 |
|
February 2011 |
9.0% | 10.4% | 10.2% | 5,393 |
|
January 2011 |
9.1% | 10.7% | 10.5% | 5,559 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
