Department of Numbers

Ann Arbor, Michigan Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Ann Arbor fell 0.2 percentage points in December 2011 to 6.0%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 3.3 percentage points lower than the Michigan rate. The unemployment rate in Ann Arbor peaked in October 2009 at 8.8% and is now 2.8 percentage points lower. You can also compare Ann Arbor unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate December 2011 Month/Month Year/Year
National 8.5% -0.2 -0.9
Michigan 9.3% -0.5 -1.8
Ann Arbor 6.0% -0.2 -1.3
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with December 2011 data as January metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Ann Arbor, Michigan, National

Ann Arbor, Michigan monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Ann Arbor, Michigan Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Ann Arbor peaked in January 2010 at 16,075. There are now 5,257 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Ann Arbor employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Ann Arbor, Michigan) is also available.

Unemployed Persons December 2011 Month/Month Year/Year
Ann Arbor 10,818 -328 -2,529

Number of Unemployed Persons

Ann Arbor, Michigan Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
Michigan
Unemployment Rate
Ann Arbor
Unemployment Rate
Ann Arbor
Unemployed
January
2012
8.3%
December
2011
8.5% 9.3% 6.0% 10,818
November
2011
8.7% 9.8% 6.2% 11,146
October
2011
8.9% 10.6% 6.5% 11,709
September
2011
9.0% 11.1% 6.7% 12,025
August
2011
9.1% 11.2% 6.7% 12,138
July
2011
9.1% 10.9% 6.6% 11,991
June
2011
9.1% 10.5% 6.7% 12,131
May
2011
9.0% 10.3% 6.7% 12,206
April
2011
9.0% 10.2% 6.8% 12,406
March
2011
8.9% 10.3% 6.9% 12,590
February
2011
9.0% 10.4% 7.0% 12,712
January
2011
9.1% 10.7% 7.2% 13,058

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.