Department of Numbers

Leominster-Fitchburg-Gardner, Massachusetts Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Leominster fell 0.3 percentage points in March 2012 to 8.8%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 2.3 percentage points higher than the Massachusetts rate. The unemployment rate in Leominster peaked in October 2009 at 11.2% and is now 2.4 percentage points lower. You can also compare Leominster unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
National 8.2% -0.1 -0.7
Massachusetts 6.5% -0.4 -1.0
Leominster 8.8% -0.3 -1.8
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with March 2012 data as April metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Leominster, Massachusetts, National

Leominster, Massachusetts monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Leominster, Massachusetts Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Leominster peaked in January 2010 at 8,258. There are now 2,013 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Leominster employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Leominster, Massachusetts) is also available.

Unemployed Persons March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
Leominster 6,245 -277 -1,597

Number of Unemployed Persons

Leominster, Massachusetts Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
Massachusetts
Unemployment Rate
Leominster
Unemployment Rate
Leominster
Unemployed
April
2012
8.1% 6.3%
March
2012
8.2% 6.5% 8.8% 6,245
February
2012
8.3% 6.9% 9.1% 6,522
January
2012
8.3% 6.9% 9.0% 6,529
December
2011
8.5% 6.9% 9.1% 6,646
November
2011
8.7% 7.0% 9.4% 6,876
October
2011
8.9% 7.1% 9.8% 7,130
September
2011
9.0% 7.2% 9.9% 7,211
August
2011
9.1% 7.4% 10.0% 7,332
July
2011
9.1% 7.4% 10.3% 7,549
June
2011
9.1% 7.4% 10.4% 7,617
May
2011
9.0% 7.4% 10.4% 7,637
April
2011
9.0% 7.5% 10.5% 7,745

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.