Department of Numbers

Des Moines-West Des Moines, Iowa Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Des Moines fell 0.2 percentage points in March 2012 to 5.3%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.1 percentage points higher than the Iowa rate. The unemployment rate in Des Moines peaked in November 2010 at 6.2% and is now 0.9 percentage points lower. You can also compare Des Moines unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
National 8.2% -0.1 -0.7
Iowa 5.2% -0.1 -0.7
Des Moines 5.3% -0.2 -0.9
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with March 2012 data as April metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Des Moines, Iowa, National

Des Moines, Iowa monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Des Moines, Iowa Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Des Moines peaked in May 2011 at 19,507. There are now 2,855 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Des Moines employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Des Moines, Iowa) is also available.

Unemployed Persons March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
Des Moines 16,652 -292 -2,781

Number of Unemployed Persons

Des Moines, Iowa Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
Iowa
Unemployment Rate
Des Moines
Unemployment Rate
Des Moines
Unemployed
April
2012
8.1% 5.1%
March
2012
8.2% 5.2% 5.3% 16,652
February
2012
8.3% 5.3% 5.5% 16,944
January
2012
8.3% 5.4% 5.5% 17,176
December
2011
8.5% 5.6% 5.7% 17,713
November
2011
8.7% 5.6% 5.7% 17,832
October
2011
8.9% 5.8% 5.9% 18,367
September
2011
9.0% 5.9% 5.9% 18,580
August
2011
9.1% 6.0% 6.0% 19,011
July
2011
9.1% 6.0% 6.1% 19,268
June
2011
9.1% 6.0% 6.2% 19,467
May
2011
9.0% 6.0% 6.2% 19,507
April
2011
9.0% 5.9% 6.2% 19,479

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.