Elkhart-Goshen, Indiana Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Elkhart fell 0.5 percentage points in March 2012 to 9.5%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.3 percentage points higher than the Indiana rate. The unemployment rate in Elkhart peaked in April 2009 at 19.7% and is now 10.2 percentage points lower. You can also compare Elkhart unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.2% | -0.1 | -0.7 |
| Indiana | 8.2% | -0.2 | -0.6 |
| Elkhart | 9.5% | -0.5 | -1.0 |
Unemployment Rate: Elkhart, Indiana, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Elkhart, Indiana Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Elkhart peaked in April 2009 at 18,057. There are now 9,116 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Elkhart employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Elkhart, Indiana) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elkhart | 8,941 | -346 | -470 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Elkhart, Indiana Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Indiana Unemployment Rate |
Elkhart Unemployment Rate |
Elkhart Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 2012 |
8.1% | 7.9% | — | — |
|
March 2012 |
8.2% | 8.2% | 9.5% | 8,941 |
|
February 2012 |
8.3% | 8.4% | 10.0% | 9,287 |
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | 8.7% | 10.6% | 9,744 |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 8.9% | 11.2% | 10,128 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 9.1% | 11.5% | 10,285 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 9.1% | 11.5% | 10,272 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 9.2% | 11.3% | 9,971 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 9.3% | 10.8% | 9,550 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 9.2% | 10.7% | 9,426 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 9.1% | 10.6% | 9,433 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 8.9% | 10.6% | 9,449 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 8.8% | 10.4% | 9,331 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
