Warner Robins, Georgia Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Warner Robins fell 0.1 percentage points in March 2013 to 7.2%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.2 percentage points lower than the Georgia rate. The unemployment rate in Warner Robins peaked in November 2010 at 8.0% and is now 0.8 percentage points lower. You can also compare Warner Robins unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | March 2013 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 7.6% | -0.1 | -0.6 |
| Georgia | 8.4% | -0.2 | -0.7 |
| Warner Robins | 7.2% | -0.1 | -0.4 |
Unemployment Rate: Warner Robins, Georgia, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Warner Robins, Georgia Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Warner Robins peaked in July 2011 at 5,714. There are now 602 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Warner Robins employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Warner Robins, Georgia) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | March 2013 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warner Robins | 5,112 | -105 | -358 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Warner Robins, Georgia Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Georgia Unemployment Rate |
Warner Robins Unemployment Rate |
Warner Robins Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 2013 |
7.5% | 8.2% | — | — |
|
March 2013 |
7.6% | 8.4% | 7.2% | 5,112 |
|
February 2013 |
7.7% | 8.6% | 7.3% | 5,217 |
|
January 2013 |
7.9% | 8.7% | 7.4% | 5,321 |
|
December 2012 |
7.8% | 8.7% | 7.5% | 5,340 |
|
November 2012 |
7.8% | 8.7% | 7.5% | 5,356 |
|
October 2012 |
7.9% | 8.8% | 7.5% | 5,379 |
|
September 2012 |
7.8% | 8.9% | 7.6% | 5,414 |
|
August 2012 |
8.1% | 9.0% | 7.6% | 5,458 |
|
July 2012 |
8.2% | 9.1% | 7.7% | 5,501 |
|
June 2012 |
8.2% | 9.1% | 7.7% | 5,529 |
|
May 2012 |
8.2% | 9.1% | 7.7% | 5,529 |
|
April 2012 |
8.1% | 9.1% | 7.7% | 5,505 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩

