Ocala, Florida Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Ocala fell 0.3 percentage points in December 2011 to 11.6%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.7 percentage points higher than the Florida rate. The unemployment rate in Ocala peaked in November 2010 at 14.0% and is now 2.4 percentage points lower. You can also compare Ocala unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.5% | -0.2 | -0.9 |
| Florida | 9.9% | -0.1 | -2.1 |
| Ocala | 11.6% | -0.3 | -2.4 |
Unemployment Rate: Ocala, Florida, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Ocala, Florida Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Ocala peaked in December 2010 at 18,797. There are now 3,402 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Ocala employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Ocala, Florida) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ocala | 15,395 | -445 | -3,402 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Ocala, Florida Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Florida Unemployment Rate |
Ocala Unemployment Rate |
Ocala Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | — | — | — |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 9.9% | 11.6% | 15,395 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 10.0% | 11.9% | 15,840 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 10.4% | 12.2% | 16,226 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 10.6% | 12.5% | 16,563 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 10.7% | 12.6% | 16,690 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 10.7% | 12.6% | 16,680 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 10.7% | 12.5% | 16,529 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 10.6% | 12.4% | 16,417 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 10.8% | 12.6% | 16,761 |
|
March 2011 |
8.9% | 11.1% | 13.0% | 17,255 |
|
February 2011 |
9.0% | 11.5% | 13.5% | 18,021 |
|
January 2011 |
9.1% | 11.9% | 14.0% | 18,759 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
