New Haven, Connecticut Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for New Haven fell 0.2 percentage points in December 2011 to 8.7%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.5 percentage points higher than the Connecticut rate. The unemployment rate in New Haven peaked in November 2010 at 9.5% and is now 0.8 percentage points lower. You can also compare New Haven unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.5% | -0.2 | -0.9 |
| Connecticut | 8.2% | -0.2 | -0.8 |
| New Haven | 8.7% | -0.2 | -0.8 |
Unemployment Rate: New Haven, Connecticut, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
New Haven, Connecticut Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in New Haven peaked in April 2011 at 30,119. There are now 2,671 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. New Haven employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in New Haven, Connecticut) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Haven | 27,448 | -613 | -2,660 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
New Haven, Connecticut Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Connecticut Unemployment Rate |
New Haven Unemployment Rate |
New Haven Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | — | — | — |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 8.2% | 8.7% | 27,448 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 8.4% | 8.9% | 28,061 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 8.7% | 9.1% | 28,649 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 8.9% | 9.2% | 28,879 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 9.0% | 9.4% | 29,250 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 9.1% | 9.4% | 29,556 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 9.1% | 9.5% | 29,922 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 9.1% | 9.5% | 30,108 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 9.1% | 9.5% | 30,119 |
|
March 2011 |
8.9% | 9.1% | 9.5% | 30,017 |
|
February 2011 |
9.0% | 9.0% | 9.5% | 30,088 |
|
January 2011 |
9.1% | 9.0% | 9.5% | 30,105 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
