Department of Numbers

Danbury, Connecticut Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Danbury fell 0.1 percentage points in March 2012 to 6.3%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.4 percentage points lower than the Connecticut rate. The unemployment rate in Danbury peaked in December 2009 at 8.0% and is now 1.7 percentage points lower. You can also compare Danbury unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
National 8.2% -0.1 -0.7
Connecticut 7.7% -0.1 -1.4
Danbury 6.3% -0.1 -1.3
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with March 2012 data as April metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Danbury, Connecticut, National

Danbury, Connecticut monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Danbury, Connecticut Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Danbury peaked in March 2010 at 7,404. There are now 1,465 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Danbury employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Danbury, Connecticut) is also available.

Unemployed Persons March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
Danbury 5,939 -46 -1,075

Number of Unemployed Persons

Danbury, Connecticut Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
Connecticut
Unemployment Rate
Danbury
Unemployment Rate
Danbury
Unemployed
April
2012
8.1% 7.7%
March
2012
8.2% 7.7% 6.3% 5,939
February
2012
8.3% 7.8% 6.4% 5,985
January
2012
8.3% 8.0% 6.6% 6,154
December
2011
8.5% 8.1% 6.8% 6,298
November
2011
8.7% 8.3% 6.9% 6,385
October
2011
8.9% 8.5% 7.0% 6,426
September
2011
9.0% 8.6% 7.0% 6,418
August
2011
9.1% 8.8% 7.1% 6,440
July
2011
9.1% 8.9% 7.1% 6,485
June
2011
9.1% 8.9% 7.3% 6,624
May
2011
9.0% 8.9% 7.4% 6,745
April
2011
9.0% 9.0% 7.5% 6,892

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.