Boulder, Colorado Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Boulder fell 0.1 percentage points in December 2011 to 6.1%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.8 percentage points lower than the Colorado rate. The unemployment rate in Boulder peaked in June 2009 at 7.3% and is now 1.2 percentage points lower. You can also compare Boulder unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.5% | -0.2 | -0.9 |
| Colorado | 7.9% | -0.1 | -1.0 |
| Boulder | 6.1% | -0.1 | -1.0 |
Unemployment Rate: Boulder, Colorado, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Boulder, Colorado Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Boulder peaked in June 2009 at 12,963. There are now 2,139 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Boulder employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Boulder, Colorado) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boulder | 10,824 | -165 | -1,439 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Boulder, Colorado Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Colorado Unemployment Rate |
Boulder Unemployment Rate |
Boulder Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | — | — | — |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 7.9% | 6.1% | 10,824 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 8.0% | 6.2% | 10,989 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 8.1% | 6.4% | 11,177 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 8.3% | 6.5% | 11,227 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 8.5% | 6.5% | 11,340 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 8.5% | 6.5% | 11,269 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 8.5% | 6.5% | 11,188 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 8.7% | 6.5% | 11,249 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 8.8% | 6.7% | 11,524 |
|
March 2011 |
8.9% | 9.2% | 7.0% | 12,066 |
|
February 2011 |
9.0% | 9.3% | 7.2% | 12,469 |
|
January 2011 |
9.1% | 9.1% | 7.2% | 12,422 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
