Department of Numbers

Visalia-Porterville, California Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Visalia fell 0.3 percentage points in December 2011 to 15.7%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 4.6 percentage points higher than the California rate. The unemployment rate in Visalia peaked in October 2010 at 17.0% and is now 1.3 percentage points lower. You can also compare Visalia unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate December 2011 Month/Month Year/Year
National 8.5% -0.2 -0.9
California 11.1% -0.2 -1.4
Visalia 15.7% -0.3 -1.3
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with December 2011 data as January metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Visalia, California, National

Visalia, California monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Visalia, California Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Visalia peaked in December 2010 at 35,750. There are now 2,647 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Visalia employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Visalia, California) is also available.

Unemployed Persons December 2011 Month/Month Year/Year
Visalia 33,103 -631 -2,647

Number of Unemployed Persons

Visalia, California Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
California
Unemployment Rate
Visalia
Unemployment Rate
Visalia
Unemployed
January
2012
8.3%
December
2011
8.5% 11.1% 15.7% 33,103
November
2011
8.7% 11.3% 16.0% 33,734
October
2011
8.9% 11.7% 16.5% 34,576
September
2011
9.0% 11.9% 16.7% 34,883
August
2011
9.1% 12.1% 16.9% 35,067
July
2011
9.1% 12.0% 16.8% 34,910
June
2011
9.1% 11.8% 16.6% 34,483
May
2011
9.0% 11.7% 16.4% 34,149
April
2011
9.0% 11.8% 16.4% 34,329
March
2011
8.9% 12.0% 16.5% 34,448
February
2011
9.0% 12.1% 16.5% 34,779
January
2011
9.1% 12.4% 16.8% 35,369

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.