Department of Numbers

Santa Cruz-Watsonville, California Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Santa Cruz fell 0.3 percentage points in March 2013 to 9.7%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.3 percentage points higher than the California rate. The unemployment rate in Santa Cruz peaked in November 2010 at 13.1% and is now 3.4 percentage points lower. You can also compare Santa Cruz unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate March 2013 Month/Month Year/Year
National 7.6% -0.1 -0.6
California 9.4% -0.2 -1.3
Santa Cruz 9.7% -0.3 -1.9
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with March 2013 data as April metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Santa Cruz, California, National

Santa Cruz, California monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Santa Cruz, California Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Santa Cruz peaked in November 2010 at 19,920. There are now 4,816 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Santa Cruz employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Santa Cruz, California) is also available.

Unemployed Persons March 2013 Month/Month Year/Year
Santa Cruz 15,104 -482 -2,261

Number of Unemployed Persons

Santa Cruz, California Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
California
Unemployment Rate
Santa Cruz
Unemployment Rate
Santa Cruz
Unemployed
April
2013
7.5% 9.0%
March
2013
7.6% 9.4% 9.7% 15,104
February
2013
7.7% 9.6% 10.0% 15,586
January
2013
7.9% 9.8% 10.2% 15,964
December
2012
7.8% 9.8% 10.3% 15,989
November
2012
7.8% 9.9% 10.5% 16,103
October
2012
7.9% 10.1% 10.6% 16,263
September
2012
7.8% 10.2% 10.8% 16,452
August
2012
8.1% 10.4% 11.0% 16,662
July
2012
8.2% 10.6% 11.2% 16,867
June
2012
8.2% 10.6% 11.4% 17,042
May
2012
8.2% 10.7% 11.5% 17,175
April
2012
8.1% 10.7% 11.6% 17,275

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.