Department of Numbers

Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, California Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Sacramento rose 0.5 percentage points in June 2010 to 12.4%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.1 percentage points higher than the California rate. The unemployment rate in Sacramento peaked in March 2010 at 12.6% and is now 0.3 percentage points lower.

Unemployment Rate June 2010 Month/Month Year/Year
National 9.5% -0.2 0.0
California 12.3% -0.1 +0.7
Sacramento 12.4% +0.5 +1.0
Note: Metro level data is not seasonally adjusted.1

Unemployment Rate: Sacramento, California, National

Sacramento, California monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Sacramento, California Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Sacramento peaked in March 2010 at 139,671. There are now 8,904 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. From a recent trough of 125,829 in May 2010, the number of unemployed has now grown by 4,938. Sacramento employment and jobs data is also available.

Unemployed Persons June 2010 Month/Month Year/Year
Sacramento 130,767 +4,938 +10,231

Number of Unemployed Persons

Sacramento, California Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
California
Unemployment Rate
Sacramento
Unemployment Rate
Sacramento
Unemployed
June
2010
9.5% 12.3% 12.4% 130,767
May
2010
9.7% 12.4% 11.9% 125,829
April
2010
9.9% 12.5% 12.3% 130,403
March
2010
9.7% 12.6% 13.1% 139,671
February
2010
9.7% 12.5% 12.9% 136,431
January
2010
9.7% 12.5% 13.1% 139,169
December
2009
10.0% 12.3% 12.2% 126,788
November
2009
10.0% 12.3% 12.0% 126,286
October
2009
10.1% 12.2% 12.0% 126,502
September
2009
9.8% 12.1% 11.7% 122,719
August
2009
9.7% 12.0% 11.6% 123,322
July
2009
9.4% 11.8% 11.6% 124,073
June
2009
9.5% 11.6% 11.4% 120,536

1. Metro area unemployment rates are not seasonally adjusted while state and national rates are. In practice this means the metro rates may be noisier on a month-to-month basis than the state and national series due to seasonal effects. It's probably better to use year-over-year comparisons.