Department of Numbers

Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, California Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Riverside fell 0.3 percentage points in March 2013 to 10.9%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 1.5 percentage points higher than the California rate. The unemployment rate in Riverside peaked in January 2010 at 14.5% and is now 3.6 percentage points lower. You can also compare Riverside unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate March 2013 Month/Month Year/Year
National 7.6% -0.1 -0.6
California 9.4% -0.2 -1.3
Riverside 10.9% -0.3 -1.6
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with March 2013 data as April metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Riverside, California, National

Riverside, California monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Riverside, California Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Riverside peaked in March 2010 at 259,968. There are now 62,856 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Riverside employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Riverside, California) is also available.

Unemployed Persons March 2013 Month/Month Year/Year
Riverside 197,112 -5,555 -27,722

Number of Unemployed Persons

Riverside, California Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
California
Unemployment Rate
Riverside
Unemployment Rate
Riverside
Unemployed
April
2013
7.5% 9.0%
March
2013
7.6% 9.4% 10.9% 197,112
February
2013
7.7% 9.6% 11.2% 202,667
January
2013
7.9% 9.8% 11.4% 206,120
December
2012
7.8% 9.8% 11.4% 206,187
November
2012
7.8% 9.9% 11.5% 208,232
October
2012
7.9% 10.1% 11.7% 210,778
September
2012
7.8% 10.2% 11.8% 213,732
August
2012
8.1% 10.4% 12.0% 216,769
July
2012
8.2% 10.6% 12.2% 219,465
June
2012
8.2% 10.6% 12.3% 221,513
May
2012
8.2% 10.7% 12.4% 222,905
April
2012
8.1% 10.7% 12.4% 223,855

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.