Redding, California Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Redding fell 0.5 percentage points in April 2013 to 11.1%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 2.1 percentage points higher than the California rate. The unemployment rate in Redding peaked in February 2010 at 15.8% and is now 4.7 percentage points lower. You can also compare Redding unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | April 2013 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 7.5% | -0.1 | -0.6 |
| California | 9.0% | -0.4 | -1.7 |
| Redding | 11.1% | -0.5 | -2.6 |
Unemployment Rate: Redding, California, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Redding, California Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Redding peaked in March 2010 at 13,490. There are now 4,550 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Redding employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Redding, California) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | April 2013 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redding | 8,940 | -347 | -2,225 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Redding, California Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
California Unemployment Rate |
Redding Unemployment Rate |
Redding Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May 2013 |
7.6% | — | — | — |
|
April 2013 |
7.5% | 9.0% | 11.1% | 8,940 |
|
March 2013 |
7.6% | 9.4% | 11.6% | 9,287 |
|
February 2013 |
7.7% | 9.6% | 12.0% | 9,680 |
|
January 2013 |
7.9% | 9.8% | 12.5% | 10,040 |
|
December 2012 |
7.8% | 9.8% | 12.8% | 10,255 |
|
November 2012 |
7.8% | 9.9% | 12.9% | 10,385 |
|
October 2012 |
7.9% | 10.1% | 13.1% | 10,544 |
|
September 2012 |
7.8% | 10.2% | 13.2% | 10,721 |
|
August 2012 |
8.1% | 10.4% | 13.4% | 10,899 |
|
July 2012 |
8.2% | 10.6% | 13.6% | 11,052 |
|
June 2012 |
8.2% | 10.6% | 13.7% | 11,152 |
|
May 2012 |
8.2% | 10.7% | 13.7% | 11,183 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩

