Merced, California Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Merced fell 0.3 percentage points in March 2013 to 15.7%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 6.3 percentage points higher than the California rate. The unemployment rate in Merced peaked in October 2010 at 18.9% and is now 3.2 percentage points lower. You can also compare Merced unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | March 2013 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 7.6% | -0.1 | -0.6 |
| California | 9.4% | -0.2 | -1.3 |
| Merced | 15.7% | -0.3 | -1.7 |
Unemployment Rate: Merced, California, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Merced, California Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Merced peaked in November 2010 at 20,738. There are now 2,994 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Merced employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Merced, California) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | March 2013 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merced | 17,744 | -345 | -1,580 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Merced, California Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
California Unemployment Rate |
Merced Unemployment Rate |
Merced Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 2013 |
7.5% | 9.0% | — | — |
|
March 2013 |
7.6% | 9.4% | 15.7% | 17,744 |
|
February 2013 |
7.7% | 9.6% | 16.0% | 18,089 |
|
January 2013 |
7.9% | 9.8% | 16.3% | 18,390 |
|
December 2012 |
7.8% | 9.8% | 16.4% | 18,390 |
|
November 2012 |
7.8% | 9.9% | 16.5% | 18,456 |
|
October 2012 |
7.9% | 10.1% | 16.6% | 18,548 |
|
September 2012 |
7.8% | 10.2% | 16.7% | 18,658 |
|
August 2012 |
8.1% | 10.4% | 16.9% | 18,780 |
|
July 2012 |
8.2% | 10.6% | 17.0% | 18,906 |
|
June 2012 |
8.2% | 10.6% | 17.2% | 19,027 |
|
May 2012 |
8.2% | 10.7% | 17.3% | 19,140 |
|
April 2012 |
8.1% | 10.7% | 17.3% | 19,238 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩

