Yuma, Arizona Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Yuma rose 0.7 percentage points in March 2012 to 28.4%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 19.8 percentage points higher than the Arizona rate. The unemployment rate for Yuma in March 2012 is at a new high. You can also compare Yuma unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.2% | -0.1 | -0.7 |
| Arizona | 8.6% | -0.1 | -1.0 |
| Yuma | 28.4% | +0.7 | +0.7 |
Unemployment Rate: Yuma, Arizona, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Yuma, Arizona Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Yuma peaked in March 2011 at 25,839. There are now 245 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. From a recent trough of 24,131 in November 2011, the number of unemployed has now grown by 1,463. Yuma employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Yuma, Arizona) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yuma | 25,594 | +380 | -245 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Yuma, Arizona Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Arizona Unemployment Rate |
Yuma Unemployment Rate |
Yuma Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 2012 |
8.1% | 8.2% | — | — |
|
March 2012 |
8.2% | 8.6% | 28.4% | 25,594 |
|
February 2012 |
8.3% | 8.7% | 27.7% | 25,214 |
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | 8.7% | 26.8% | 24,596 |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 9.0% | 25.9% | 24,315 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 9.1% | 25.5% | 24,131 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 9.2% | 25.7% | 24,415 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 9.4% | 25.7% | 24,482 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 9.5% | 25.7% | 24,530 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 9.6% | 26.0% | 24,756 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 9.6% | 26.2% | 24,618 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 9.6% | 26.6% | 24,916 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 9.6% | 27.1% | 25,314 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
