Department of Numbers

Tuscaloosa, Alabama Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Tuscaloosa fell 0.2 percentage points in March 2012 to 7.2%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.2 percentage points lower than the Alabama rate. The unemployment rate in Tuscaloosa peaked in August 2009 at 9.8% and is now 2.6 percentage points lower. You can also compare Tuscaloosa unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
National 8.2% -0.1 -0.7
Alabama 7.4% -0.1 -1.9
Tuscaloosa 7.2% -0.2 -1.2
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with March 2012 data as April metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Tuscaloosa, Alabama, National

Tuscaloosa, Alabama monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Tuscaloosa, Alabama Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Tuscaloosa peaked in September 2009 at 9,739. There are now 2,574 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Tuscaloosa employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Tuscaloosa, Alabama) is also available.

Unemployed Persons March 2012 Month/Month Year/Year
Tuscaloosa 7,165 -150 -1,142

Number of Unemployed Persons

Tuscaloosa, Alabama Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
Alabama
Unemployment Rate
Tuscaloosa
Unemployment Rate
Tuscaloosa
Unemployed
April
2012
8.1% 7.2%
March
2012
8.2% 7.4% 7.2% 7,165
February
2012
8.3% 7.5% 7.4% 7,315
January
2012
8.3% 7.8% 7.7% 7,611
December
2011
8.5% 8.0% 8.2% 8,125
November
2011
8.7% 8.3% 8.7% 8,572
October
2011
8.9% 8.5% 9.0% 8,936
September
2011
9.0% 8.8% 9.3% 9,167
August
2011
9.1% 9.1% 9.2% 9,128
July
2011
9.1% 9.2% 9.2% 9,143
June
2011
9.1% 9.3% 8.9% 8,821
May
2011
9.0% 9.3% 9.0% 9,037
April
2011
9.0% 9.2% 8.6% 8,596

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.