Decatur, Alabama Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Decatur fell 0.1 percentage points in March 2012 to 7.3%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.1 percentage points lower than the Alabama rate. The unemployment rate in Decatur peaked in December 2009 at 11.0% and is now 3.7 percentage points lower. You can also compare Decatur unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.2% | -0.1 | -0.7 |
| Alabama | 7.4% | -0.1 | -1.9 |
| Decatur | 7.3% | -0.1 | -2.1 |
Unemployment Rate: Decatur, Alabama, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Decatur, Alabama Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Decatur peaked in January 2010 at 7,863. There are now 2,621 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Decatur employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Decatur, Alabama) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | March 2012 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decatur | 5,242 | -82 | -1,464 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Decatur, Alabama Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Alabama Unemployment Rate |
Decatur Unemployment Rate |
Decatur Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 2012 |
8.1% | 7.2% | — | — |
|
March 2012 |
8.2% | 7.4% | 7.3% | 5,242 |
|
February 2012 |
8.3% | 7.5% | 7.4% | 5,324 |
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | 7.8% | 7.7% | 5,534 |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 8.0% | 8.1% | 5,816 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 8.3% | 8.8% | 6,284 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 8.5% | 9.3% | 6,696 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 8.8% | 9.7% | 6,989 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 9.1% | 9.7% | 6,978 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 9.2% | 9.7% | 6,980 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 9.3% | 9.8% | 7,053 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 9.3% | 9.6% | 6,894 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 9.2% | 9.4% | 6,778 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
