Department of Numbers

Birmingham-Hoover, Alabama Unemployment

The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Birmingham fell 0.5 percentage points in December 2011 to 7.8%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.3 percentage points lower than the Alabama rate. The unemployment rate in Birmingham peaked in September 2009 at 9.8% and is now 2.0 percentage points lower. You can also compare Birmingham unemployment with unemployment in other cities.

Unemployment Rate December 2011 Month/Month Year/Year
National 8.5% -0.2 -0.9
Alabama 8.1% -0.6 -1.0
Birmingham 7.8% -0.5 -1.0
Note: Metro level data is now seasonally adjusted.1 All comparisons are made with December 2011 data as January metro level unemployment data has not yet been released.

Unemployment Rate: Birmingham, Alabama, National

Birmingham, Alabama monthly unemployment rate chart

Note: Recessions shown in gray.

Birmingham, Alabama Unemployed

The number of people unemployed in Birmingham peaked in September 2009 at 51,735. There are now 11,020 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Birmingham employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Birmingham, Alabama) is also available.

Unemployed Persons December 2011 Month/Month Year/Year
Birmingham 40,715 -2,689 -4,726

Number of Unemployed Persons

Birmingham, Alabama Unemployment History

Date National
Unemployment Rate
Alabama
Unemployment Rate
Birmingham
Unemployment Rate
Birmingham
Unemployed
January
2012
8.3%
December
2011
8.5% 8.1% 7.8% 40,715
November
2011
8.7% 8.7% 8.3% 43,404
October
2011
8.9% 9.3% 8.7% 45,640
September
2011
9.0% 9.8% 9.0% 47,209
August
2011
9.1% 9.9% 9.0% 47,377
July
2011
9.1% 10.0% 9.1% 48,132
June
2011
9.1% 9.9% 9.1% 47,853
May
2011
9.0% 9.6% 8.9% 46,681
April
2011
9.0% 9.3% 8.7% 45,043
March
2011
8.9% 9.2% 8.4% 43,569
February
2011
9.0% 9.3% 8.6% 44,293
January
2011
9.1% 9.3% 8.7% 44,812

1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers.