Anniston-Oxford, Alabama Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Anniston fell 0.6 percentage points in December 2011 to 8.2%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.1 percentage points higher than the Alabama rate. The unemployment rate in Anniston peaked in October 2009 at 10.6% and is now 2.4 percentage points lower. You can also compare Anniston unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
| Unemployment Rate | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| National | 8.5% | -0.2 | -0.9 |
| Alabama | 8.1% | -0.6 | -1.0 |
| Anniston | 8.2% | -0.6 | -0.8 |
Unemployment Rate: Anniston, Alabama, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Anniston, Alabama Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Anniston peaked in September 2009 at 5,685. There are now 1,348 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Anniston employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Anniston, Alabama) is also available.
| Unemployed Persons | December 2011 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anniston | 4,337 | -307 | -366 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Anniston, Alabama Unemployment History
| Date |
National Unemployment Rate |
Alabama Unemployment Rate |
Anniston Unemployment Rate |
Anniston Unemployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 2012 |
8.3% | — | — | — |
|
December 2011 |
8.5% | 8.1% | 8.2% | 4,337 |
|
November 2011 |
8.7% | 8.7% | 8.8% | 4,644 |
|
October 2011 |
8.9% | 9.3% | 9.4% | 4,978 |
|
September 2011 |
9.0% | 9.8% | 9.8% | 5,243 |
|
August 2011 |
9.1% | 9.9% | 9.8% | 5,285 |
|
July 2011 |
9.1% | 10.0% | 9.9% | 5,342 |
|
June 2011 |
9.1% | 9.9% | 9.9% | 5,301 |
|
May 2011 |
9.0% | 9.6% | 9.6% | 5,124 |
|
April 2011 |
9.0% | 9.3% | 9.2% | 4,912 |
|
March 2011 |
8.9% | 9.2% | 9.0% | 4,760 |
|
February 2011 |
9.0% | 9.3% | 9.2% | 4,792 |
|
January 2011 |
9.1% | 9.3% | 9.1% | 4,742 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩
